InsideCrypto operates under a defined editorial framework designed to ensure accuracy, independence, and regulatory awareness in coverage of blockchain technology and digital asset markets.
The publication reports on financial infrastructure that carries material risk, legal complexity, and cross-border implications. Editorial standards reflect that responsibility.
1. Editorial Independence
Editorial decisions are made independently from commercial interests, advertisers, sponsors, token issuers, exchanges, public relations firms, and other external parties.
Revenue relationships do not determine topic selection, article framing, headline construction, or publication timing.
Commercial content, when published, is clearly labeled and structurally separated from newsroom material. Editorial staff are not compensated based on traffic performance of specific tokens, projects, or assets.
2. Accuracy and Source Standards
All factual reporting must rely on verifiable information.
Primary sources are prioritized, including:
-
Official protocol documentation
-
Regulatory filings and enforcement notices
-
Court records and legislative texts
-
Public governance proposals
-
On-chain data from reputable analytics providers
-
Direct statements from identifiable representatives
Where data originates from third-party research firms, exchanges, or analytics platforms, attribution is provided.
Headlines and summaries must accurately reflect article content. Sensational framing, selective omission, or distortion of material context is not permitted.
3. Distinction Between Reporting and Opinion
InsideCrypto publishes both factual reporting and analytical commentary.
-
News articles present verified information and contextual analysis.
-
Opinion pieces reflect the author’s perspective and are clearly labeled.
Opinion content must still rely on verifiable information and may not present speculative forecasts as factual certainty.
4. Market Coverage and Risk Context
Digital asset markets are volatile and structurally complex.
When covering price movements, token launches, protocol upgrades, derivatives activity, or liquidity shifts, reporting includes relevant risk context where appropriate. Articles do not contain investment recommendations, trading signals, or performance guarantees.
The publication does not provide personalized financial advice and does not assume a fiduciary role toward readers.
5. Conflicts of Interest
Contributors are expected to disclose material conflicts of interest that may affect objectivity.
This includes:
-
Significant personal holdings in assets directly discussed
-
Advisory roles with covered entities
-
Compensation relationships with industry participants
Where a conflict is identified, it may be disclosed within the article or the contributor may be reassigned.
6. Corrections and Updates
If a material factual error is identified, it is corrected promptly.
Substantive corrections are reflected transparently within the article. Minor typographical edits may be made without formal notation.
In rapidly evolving situations, articles may be updated to reflect new information. Update timestamps are adjusted where appropriate.
7. Regulatory Sensitivity
Coverage of enforcement actions, licensing frameworks, compliance requirements, or legal disputes is written with awareness of jurisdictional differences.
Regulatory interpretation is based on publicly available legal documentation and official communications. Articles do not substitute for professional legal advice.
8. Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools
AI-assisted drafting or research tools may be used as part of internal workflows. All published content is subject to human editorial review prior to publication.
Responsibility for accuracy remains with the publication.
InsideCrypto’s editorial framework is designed to maintain structural clarity, reduce conflicts of interest, and ensure consistent standards across global digital asset coverage.