Solana (SOL) rose 12% although signs show that its support is weak, expecting a major slowdown and selling by long-term holders.The immediate bounce in SOL unfolded against a backdrop of weakening on-chain fundamentals.
Data from the HODLer Net Position Change metric showed that long-term accumulation had slowed significantly and, in some instances, turned negative. This shift signaled fading conviction among holders who typically provide stability during market stress. At the same time, many short-term holders remained underwater, creating the risk of renewed selling pressure if the recovery lost momentum.
Solana focused exchange-traded funds recorded approximately $11.86 million in outflows, while futures open interest fell to around $5.32 billion. Together, these indicators suggested a reduction in institutional exposure and declining speculative conviction. Rather than signaling renewed risk appetite, the bounce appeared to coincide with position trimming and lower leverage.
The Money Flow Index approached oversold territory, but the supply-side withdrawal among long-term holders undercut the case for a lasting recovery.
Can solana maintain key support?
SOL remained confined within a descending channel characterized by lower highs and lower lows, reflecting a clear downtrend across multiple timeframes. In addition, analysts highlighted a developing head-and-shoulders formation, a classic technical pattern that often precedes breakdowns if key support levels fail.
Near-term resistance was identified in the $80 to $96 range, while $70 stood out as a major psychological support level. A decisive move below that threshold was projected to accelerate selling pressure toward the $50 area, with even $30 mentioned as a deeper downside band under extended stress. These levels effectively define the battlefield for the coming sessions.
The broader technical posture — including a down‑tilted monthly structure cited in the source material — framed the recent 12% bounce as corrective rather than trend‑reversing. Analysts referenced in the reporting noted that a failure to clear the stated resistance within one to two weeks would likely confirm the descending channel and set the stage for further declines.

